Guaranteeing a win in sports is like playing with fire. It usually does not go well for the person or team that made the guarantee. Sure, the guarantees of Joe Namath and Mark Messier worked out well for both their teams; bringing two championships to the city of New York. But the guarantee Interim Head Coach Paul Aarons made in his season exit interview was different. Aarons was just the interim head coach and therefore did not have a guaranteed job in 2012. Yes, he did deliver on two of his three promises he made since becoming head coach in late November 2011. But I wasn’t too impressed with the job Aarons did. His 2-2 record made me believe that Aarons was an average head coach and if I wanted the Rebels to become league champions, I was going to need an elite head coach.
As soon as the 2011 Yuma Scorpion Season ended, I began a search for the next head coach of the California Rebels. I announced to the press that I was searching for a head coach and that in my search, I would not consider myself a candidate and return to the field as head coach. In the third week of January 2012, I finalized a list of five candidates for the job.
First, we had Paul Aarons; despite me not being fully impressed with the work Aarons had done as interim head coach, I felt he deserved an interview and chance to sell me his vision of California Rebels football. The second candidate was Paul Samuels, a Division II head coach at the University of Idaho State. Samuels had been the head coach for the past eight seasons, helping ISU capture three conference championships. The third candidate I looked at was 59-year-old Lynn Baker. Baker was a high school coach from a small Wisconsin town. Baker had fifteen years of experience as a high school head coach. The only knock on Coach Baker was that he had never delivered a championship, made the playoffs only four times, and had an overall winning percentage of 34%. His longevity at his school was impressive, but the categories that matter the most (playoffs and championships), Lynn Baker was lacking in.